Benchmarking

October 10, 2008

A first look at the Nseries and the 16GB microSDHC cards

Sdhc_m2_16gb_deSandisk has done it again! It wasn’t long ago we reached the amazing 8GB mark for storage in the tiny format called microSDHC. Now we have in fact doubled the capacity reaching an impressive 16GB  of storage on a medium no bigger than your average finger nail. The idea behind this post is try to clear misunderstandings behind the microSDHC format and see how a typical Nseries device, in this case the N82 black performs with the new 16GB cards.

Continue reading "A first look at the Nseries and the 16GB microSDHC cards" »

July 20, 2008

How fast is the E71 when it comes to data transfer speed?

The Nokia E71 is another handset supporting microSDHC, meaning that it can use microSD cards up to 32GB. Wondering how fast you can fill up those cards? The transfer speed is going to be key! Using the HD Tach storage benchmark using the included 2GB memory card and we got the following numbers (in MB/s):

E71benchmarktransfer1_2

Basically it speeds is about as fast as recent Nseries devices like the n95 8GB or even earlier devices like the N76. Only the Internet Tablets are faster at 5.1MB/s.

May 25, 2008

Benchmark your Nseries with newly released JBenchmark SVG

JbenchmarksvglaunchKishonti Informatics, the guys behind JBenchmark have released their latest benchmark in the form of JBenchmark SVG.

The new version features:
- Heavy load on animation, DOM access and modification, spline and polygon rendering
- Mapping test
- User Interface simulation
- Font rendering
- Gaming
- Cartoon animation
- SVG load and parse test
- Low level performance tests

What’s cool about the JBenchmark series, including the new JBenchmark SVG, is that you can customize the benchmark by choosing what subtests to include. These subtests are like small test benchmarking your Nseries performing different tests like gaming, cartoon animation etc. and upload the results and compare to other devices.

If you’re interested in more graphic-intensive benchmarking you can always try the Futuremark’s SPMark for Symbian OS or Nokia E3 Tech Demo. The hardware-accelerated Nseries are known to ace these test, but how do they perform in 2D, animation and mapping tests?

Continue reading "Benchmark your Nseries with newly released JBenchmark SVG" »

November 23, 2007

Benchmarking the Nseries

Spm_symb09_big If you remember a few days backed I talked about this cool 3D tech Demo designed by FutureMark for Nokia. All of those nice graphics are made possible by the N82’s Texas Instrument's OMAP 2 chip which just happens to have Imagination Technologies’ Power VR MBX core with VGP.  In fact the E90 has it, including all variants of the N95, N93, N93i, N800 and the new N810, although the situation with the N800 and N810 is still a mystery to me. The great thing about this chip is that it has support for Open ES 1.1. This comes down to these phones being capable of displaying some pretty impressive graphics as you have seen in my previous post. This also makes them of one the fastest devices when it comes to 3D graphics. With faster I mean graphics pushing power to enable higher frame rates.  So how much faster are the E- and Nseries devices equipped with the OMAP 2/ Power VR MBX combo when  compared to devices from other brands? To find one, we have to do something that many PC gamers have done for years: benchmarking.  Benchmarking is basically running a program or a set of programs in order to assess the performance of computer hardware. But in this case we are going to benchmark a phone!!! (I mean multimedia computer, sorry Nokia)

Spmarkreview1a  Spmarkreview2aa Spmarkreview2a Spmarkreview3

How do we benchmark? FutureMark, the same guys that created the demo I talked about before have several 3D demos to test your device’s performance. They also allow you to upload your scores (Java only) and compare them to the scores of other users. This will allow you to see how your device does against other models and manufacturers. The app also includes information about your device including CPU and OpenGL technology being used. Strange that among the many apps it also reports that the N82’s CPU is running at 206Mhz. Anywho, all samples of a specific model like the N95 should perform the same, but the cool thing is that sometimes you might be lucky enough to get a sample that just happens to run faster and thus scores higher. Most of their benchmarks are not free, but luckily there’s SPMark for Symbian OS v9 (3D gaming) and SPMarkJava JSR 184 (Java performance).

SPMark for Symbian OS v9 and SPMarkJava JSR 184 can be downloaded here and here. How did your device fair against the other? What scores did you get?

November 18, 2007

Nokia E3 Tech Demo running on N82

Over at the Daily Mobile they have found a Tech Demo apparently that Nokia used or is supposed to use at E3. The benchmark starts with the Nokia and FutureMark logo, so I would guess it was specifically made for Nokia by FutureMark for demo at E3. I looked on the FutureMark site and it wasn't available anywhere on their site, indicating that it probably a custom made benchmark. To showcase how this thing runs on a 3D accelerated device I have created a video of it running on the recently announced N82 which according to the product managers also has the OMAP2 which enables it to produce hardware 3D accelerated graphics. The demo should work fine on all OMAP2-equiped devices like the E90, all variants of the N95, N93 and N93i. It should work on other devices, but due to the lack of the 3D hardware it will run very slow and some graphic effects will be disabled. The file can be downloaded here. You will need a program that can open .RAR files to view the content. Any of you with the N80 or N73, how does it run on your device?

Update: an owner of the N73 confirmed that it doesn’t run at all on that device.

November 16, 2007

How fast is the N82?

N82thenewroadrunner The Nseries models, especially those aimed as “imaging” devices have suffered a lot of critique due their slow camera start-up.  The N95 was a good example of this: by the time the camera was activated the photo opportunity was already gone. Even for group shots it took way too long: by the time the camera had activated the smiles had turned into fake grins followed by an expression on their faces that could only mean one thing: get it over with it! Even if the camera had activated things were far from over: you would have to half-press the shutter button and wait for it to focus. By this time they would think that you had already taken 5 shots, only for them to be confronted by me saying: ”wait it’s focusing.” With the development of the N82, Nokia seems to have taken photography very seriously as it has a proper lens cover, excellent image quality and low noise (which I’ll cover soon) and most importantly a very fast camera activation time. As a bonus it’s pretty fast at booting too, just in case you have to quickly turn on your device. It seems like those days of slow camera and phones start-up time are over for now, as there will always be room for improvement. But for now it’s there is no denying that the camera start-up time has been increased dramatically. To illustrate this I’ve made a video. Are you happy with the performance levels the N82 has achieved?

November 12, 2007

A matter of performance

While doing a review of a Sandisk microSDHC card (expect the review soon) I had to test several cards using both a card reader and inserted into phones, connected via USB. The performance numbers that the benchmarks produced were kind of disappointing, but not unexpected. I’m specifically talking about the speed at which data is passed through the USB connection and written on internal media via either internal memory (Like N81 8GB) and card slot (like N76). So I decided to closely investigate how the Nseries perform when it comes to reading and writing from their swappable or internal media. Now I must admit I have no idea at what speed data is written onto the memory card or internal memory as Nokia has never published these numbers. But what I do know is that USB 1.0 Low-Speed has a data rate of 1.5 MB/s and Full-speed at 12 MB/s. Now the much faster USB 2.0, now called Hi-Speed USB, has a whopping data rate of 480 MB/s.  But what we do have to remember is that the effective speed is mostly determined by the USB connection, the card or internal memory itself (the speed at which it can be read from and written to) and the speed at which the phone itself reads and writes from and to the memory card. The most important thing to remember is that the entire data chain is as fast as the lowest denominator. In other words no matter how fast USB 2.0 can be, if the other variables are slower it will make the entire process of data transfer slow. With that in mind let’s see how some of these Nseries perform. In this case I’m using the N76 and N81 8GB and we will directly compare them using a dedicated card reader: the Sandisk microSDHC

Test system: HP DV6500 notebook with a 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processor,  2GB of DDR2 RAM, Nvidia GeForce 8400M video card, 200 GB 4200RPM Serial ATA hard drive with USB 2.0 ports and Vista Home Premium.

Test Devices:

-Nokia N81 8GB (Data transfer mode)

-Nokia N76 (Data transfer mode, using Sandisk 4GB microSDHC )

-Sandisk 4GB microSDHC

-Sandisk MicroMate card reader.

Benchmarks used:

-SiSoftware Sandra’s Removable Storage module

-HD Tach (Read speed)

-MP3 Copy Test (619MB worth of MP3 files copied to device)

SiSoft Sandra

Matterperformancebench44 Matterperformancebench33 Matterperformancebench22 Matterperformancebench1_2

The first benchmark used was SiSoft Sandra’s Removable Storage module. The results are in KB/s. It does have a “Mobile Device Transfer” benchmark, but this is only compatible with Windows Mobile devices. First thing that’s clear with these results is that the read and write performance drops as the file sizes get smaller. Second thing that’s very obvious is that a card reader leaves both the N76 and N81 8GB far beyond in performs. The slow performance overall is clearly due to the sluggish performing Nseries devices as the Sandisk MicroMate card reader and the N76 used the same Sandisk 4GB microSD. Third thing that stood out was that N76 and N81 8GB performed almost identical. But as I said before there are three main variables: the USB connection, the card or internal memory and the speed at which the phone itself reads and writes from and to the memory card. So I decided to use the slower 1GB Nokia microSD card included with N76 to try to see if the performance would drop. The slower Nokia card performed exactly like the faster Sandisk’s 4GB microSDHC card. This means that the N76’s USB connections or the way it writes or reads from the memory card is limiting the cards performance.

HD Tach

Matterperformancebench55

HD Tach is a low level hardware benchmark for random access read/write storage (In this case only read, as I only had the trial version) devices such as hard drives, removable drives (ZIP/JAZZ), flash devices, and RAID arrays. HD Tach uses custom device drivers and other low level Windows interfaces to bypass as many layers of software as possible and get as close to the physical performance of the device possible. The results are in MB/s. From the HD Tach Benchmark numbers it’s again quite clear  that both N81 8GB and N76 produce similar numbers. The unusual part is that the N76 and the Sandisk card reader are using the same 4GB microSD card, yet the N76 only manages 0.8MB/s while the card reader squeezes almost 11MB/s out of it. This could only mean that the N76 and possibly the N81 8GB are limiting their performance through either a slow USB 2.0 interface or via a slow system that reads/writes to and from their storage mediums. I was also curious as to how the cards included in the standard packages would perform. The 1GB Nokia branded microSD performs quite admirably for a free card scoring 8.5MB/s in HD Tach. While the included Nokia card is nowhere near slow, an upgraded 4 GB Sandisk microSD card performs faster. The higher rated 6 and 8 GB microSD cards from Sandisk have a higher minimum read speed so these should perform faster when compared to the 4GB version.

MP3 copy test

The last test consisted of copying 619MB worth of MP3 files from the test system to the memory card using the Sandisk MobileMate card reader. The 4GB Sandisk microSDHC took 2min 17 sec and the 1GB Nokia branded vanilla card took about 3min 28 sec. Because these tests were performed using the card reader we are sure these are the pretty close to the max we can get out of them. . The Nokia N76 using the 4GB Sandisk microSDHC took a slow 12min 7 seconds to complete the task while the vanilla Nokia card took 12min 28 seconds. Again, this test indicates that Nokia’s Nseries have a bottleneck limiting the card’s performance.

Conclusion

Based on these simple tests we can come to several conclusions:

-In current generation Nseries, no matter if the device is using internal memory (N81 8GB) or card slot (N76) they perform very similar.

-A dedicated USB 2.0 card reader outperforms current Nseries devices by a large margin when it comes to USB data performance.

-Current Nseries devices have a bottleneck that is limiting the performance of high-speed cards: The same 4GB Sandisk microUSB card scored: 0.8MB/s in the N76, while the card reader managed to squeeze almost 11MB/s out of the same card!

I also did a little searching and came across this N91 review done by Mobile-Review. If you remember the N91 has a true built-in hard drive of 4GB, unlike the N81 8GB which uses flash memory, possibly just a card attached on the inside. The N91 uses a Hitachi Microdrive 3K4-4 which has a Sustained Data Rate – 4.3-7.2 MB/s, which indicates that they do have the knowledge to create a device with a decent 4+MB/s throughput, but why are current devices performing so slow?

My Photo

Sports Tracker Widget

  • Widget

    Nokia Nseries Widget

    The Nokia Guide

    In order to view the Nokia Nseries Widget you need JavaScript and Flash Player 9+ support

Google Search

  • Google

WOM World Widget

Adsense

Adsense Ads

Adsense Ads 2

Pages